Transcript:
S: I was
the project manager I lost money (.) but the reason I lost money (.) and I
could've made a fortune in that shopping centre this morning(.) if we started
this |morning|
SA: |could've|
S:
cause I'm |good|
SA:|could've| (.) yeah (.) could've should've
would've (.) yeah (.) but you didn't right
S: No Sir |Alan|
SA:
|No| (.) you didn't (.) yeah (3) I think I've heard enough (.) for me to
make a (.) very difficult decision here |today|
C: |Sir|
Alan may I say one more thing please (3)
SA: If you insist (1)
C: I think in this whole competition (.) if you
sit back and remain quiet and under the radar (1) people assume their safe (1)
and I've been bold and I know I'm vocal |and|
SA:
|you've| been bold |alright|
C: |and it |puts |me|
SA: |don't| worry| about that
C:
|and| it puts me in a vulnerable position (.) I'm sorry I've |sat| here
SA:
|the| trouble is (.) you know (.) you never back off (1) you know what
I'll tell you what I'm gonna do with you (.) I'll tell you what I'm gonna do
with you (1) I'm getting sick and tired with you denying all of this (.) I'm
sick of looking at you (.) now get out that door (2) get back to the bloody
house (.) ok (.) get back to the house (.) yeah (.) because you're gonna be the
next team leader (.) I'm sick of looking at you at the moment (.) get out that
door (.) and get back to the house
Explanation:
1.
What is interesting about the language
used is that despite the formal setting, there are constant interruptions. Although
it is Sir Alan who interrupts the most (six times), which could be because of
his power status. Both his influential and instrumental power allows him to be
able to interrupt without sounding rude.
2.
I could use the Dominance Theory
when analysing the transcript. Zimmerman and West put forward the idea that men
interrupt more than women. This can be proven by comparing Sir Alan's
interruptions, 6, to Claire's, 3.
3.
I could also compare the type of
grammar that all three people. They have different levels of power and so use
different types of words when talking to each other.
4. The
title I could use for an investigation into data like this could be: How does interruptions in formal situations
show the difference in our language?
5.
Real data that I could collect is a
transcript from a business meeting or formal situation.
good. The title could be 'How far does the pattern of interruptions in a formal business meeting support Dominance theory?' to link it more closely to theory. Avoid using pronouns like "our" that include yourself so you can be objective.
ReplyDelete